Iran’s judiciary

Iran’s Judiciary Accelerates Death Penalty Use Amid Widening Protest Crackdown

Iran is rapidly moving to carry out a death sentence against a young protester just days after his arrest, as authorities signal a broader shift toward expedited capital punishments for demonstrators, according to multiple international rights groups and news agencies.
Twenty-six-year-old Erfan Soltani, who was detained on 8 January in the city of Fardis near Tehran, now faces execution after an unusually swift legal process that, rights organisations contend, lacked basic fairness and transparency. His family was informed that the sentence was finalized and that the execution could take place on Wednesday, 14 January — less than a week after his arrest.
Advocates say Soltani was denied access to independent legal representation and that judicial authorities prevented his lawyer-sister from viewing his case file. The family has reportedly only been granted a very brief visit, raising fears it was a final farewell before the execution.

Judicial Messaging: ‘Speed and Severity’
Iran’s top judicial officials have publicly endorsed fast-tracked prosecutions and severe penalties for individuals detained during nationwide protests — a stance that has alarmed human rights observers. Supreme Court Chief Justice Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei has described a need to swiftly “punish” those authorities label as having engaged in violent acts or threats to national security.
State media portray the measures as necessary to curb what they characterize as “terrorism” and “foreign-backed unrest.” However, critics argue that economic grievances have rapidly morphed into a broader anti-government movement, driven by longstanding public discontent over economic hardship, political repression and deteriorating living conditions.

Wider Crackdown and Communication Blackout
The potential execution of Soltani comes amid one of the largest protest movements in Iran in decades. Rights groups estimate that thousands of people have been killed and more than 10,000 arrested since demonstrations intensified late last month, though exact figures vary widely due to an extensive government-imposed internet and communications blackout.
The shutdown has severely restricted independent reporting from inside the country, making it difficult to verify details about deaths, arrests, and judicial processes. Activists and international monitors warn that the combination of restricted communications and accelerated capital sentences could further conceal violations of due process.

Global Reaction and Escalating Tensions
International reactions to the crackdown have been swift. The United States, for example, has publicly condemned the potential execution of Soltani and warned of “very strong action” if executions of protesters proceed. President Donald Trump and other officials have paused diplomatic engagement and imposed additional sanctions as tensions rise.
European nations and human rights organisations including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have also urged Iran to respect legal norms, arguing expedited executions without fair trials violate international law.
However, Tehran has doubled down on its position, framing the protests as threats to national security and vowing to manage them through strict judicial measures.

What This Could Mean Going Forward
If Soltani’s execution is carried out — as scheduled — it would mark a significant escalation in Tehran’s response to the unrest, potentially setting a precedent for further use of the death penalty against political protesters. Observers fear this could deepen domestic tensions and further strain already volatile relations between Iran and Western governments.
Human rights groups are calling for urgent international intervention to halt executions and to ensure that legal standards, including the right to fair trial and access to counsel, are upheld for all detainees in Iran’s protest wave.

Scroll to Top